Provider Overview (by Benchmark Speed)
Sorted by best measured throughput. Click any provider for full model listings and detailed benchmark history.
| Provider | Models Benchmarked | Best Tok/s | Median Tok/s | Best Model | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bedrock | 27 | 119 | 49 | Nova Micro 1.0 | Enterprise compliance |
| inception | 4 | 107 | 38 | Mercury 2 | General purpose |
| makora | 2 | 94 | 78 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | General purpose |
| wafer | 10 | 89 | 37 | GLM 5.3 | General purpose |
| 18 | 89 | 47 | Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) | GCP integration | |
| cerebras | 1 | 89 | 89 | gpt-oss-120b | General purpose |
| primeintellect | 2 | 86 | 76 | Moondream 3 Preview | General purpose |
| azure | 12 | 86 | 20 | GPT-6 Luna Pro | Enterprise, Microsoft |
| nebius | 7 | 86 | 37 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | General purpose |
| decart | 2 | 83 | 12 | GLM 5.2 | General purpose |
| cohere | 7 | 81 | 25 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | General purpose |
| deepinfra | 40 | 77 | 9 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Open-weight speed |
| groq | 4 | 76 | 64 | gpt-oss-120b | Speed, low latency |
| phala | 9 | 75 | 5 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | General purpose |
| inferencenet | 6 | 74 | 10 | Schematron V2 Small | General purpose |
Provider Profiles
OpenAI
The market leader for frontier models. GPT-5, GPT-5 Nano, o3, and o1 series lead reasoning, coding, and general capability benchmarks. Best ecosystem support and widest third-party integrations.
Best for: Frontier model quality, reasoning tasks, coding assistants, and applications where API reliability and ecosystem maturity matter most.
Watch out for: Direct OpenAI API throughput is lower than inference-optimized providers. Premium pricing on frontier models.
Anthropic
Claude 3 and Claude 4 models excel at instruction-following, long-context analysis, and safe output. Strong performer for document processing, multi-turn dialogue, and tasks requiring precise adherence to complex instructions.
Best for: Long-context analysis, instruction-following, regulated industries where output safety matters, and applications needing reliable structured output.
Watch out for: Smaller model catalog than OpenAI. API throughput is moderate.
Groq
Purpose-built inference hardware (LPUs) delivers category-leading throughput on open-weight models. Llama 3.3 70B and Qwen 3-32B regularly top speed benchmarks at 150+ tok/s with near-zero TTFT.
Best for: Real-time applications, voice interfaces, gaming, and any workload where sub-second streaming response start matters more than frontier model quality.
Watch out for: Limited to open-weight models. No GPT-4 or Claude. Rate limits can be tight on free tier.
AWS Bedrock
Aggregates models from Anthropic, Meta, Mistral, Amazon Nova, and others under one AWS-native API. Nova Micro (~118 tok/s) is the fastest Bedrock model. Strong compliance story: SOC2, HIPAA, FedRAMP.
Best for: Enterprise teams already on AWS. VPC-native deployments. HIPAA/FedRAMP compliance requirements. Data residency control.
Watch out for: API overhead adds latency vs direct provider calls. More complex IAM setup.
DeepInfra
One of the fastest open-weight inference providers, particularly on smaller models. Qwen 3.5-2B at ~203 tok/s and multiple 100+ tok/s options. OpenAI-compatible API.
Best for: High-volume, cost-sensitive workloads on open-weight models. Speed-critical applications where proprietary models are not required.
Watch out for: Less brand recognition than major providers. SLA / support coverage less mature than Groq or Fireworks.
Key Insights
OpenAI and Anthropic lead on model quality and capability breadth; inference-optimized providers (Groq, DeepInfra, Fireworks) lead on raw speed.
AWS Bedrock and Azure OpenAI suit enterprise teams with existing cloud agreements, compliance requirements, or VPC-native data residency needs.
Google Vertex AI integrates natively with Gemini models and GCP infrastructure — the strongest choice if you're already on Google Cloud.
Together AI and Fireworks offer the widest selection of open-weight models (Llama, Mistral, Qwen, DeepSeek) at competitive prices.
No single provider wins across all dimensions: speed, quality, price, compliance, and model variety all trade off differently.